Traits
Studied By Eugenicists
Jan
Witkowski, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
In
the early 20th century, Charles Davenport was prominent among American
biologists as director of three institutions based at Cold Spring Harbor
– the Eugenics Record Office (ERO), the Biological Laboratory, and the
Carnegie Institute of Washington's Station for Experimental Evolution.
Although initially skeptical of the wide applicability of Mendel's work,
Davenport soon became an enthusiast and developed an early interest in
the application of Mendel's laws to human beings. He noted in his 1909
Annual Report that the inability to conduct controlled experiments ruled
out human genetics as a suitable topic for the Station for Experimental
Evolution. Nevertheless, "the necessity of applying new knowledge to human
affairs has been too evident to permit us to overlook it."
Davenport
and his wife, Gertrude, published four papers between 1907 and 1910 that
applied Mendelian principles to the human inheritance of eye color, hair
color, hair texture and pigmentation. These were respectable studies,
and the paper on skin pigmentation made the first reference to polygenic
inheritance – a trait influenced by two or more genes. However, these
papers also had methodological problems that foreshadowed later criticisms
of eugenics research. For example, the eye color paper relied on data
supplied by "school principals and other friends." Difficulties arose
during data analysis, because of ambiguity in the varied descriptions
of discrete eye coloration supplied by such a variety of collaborators.
This became a much more serious problem when Davenport and other eugenicists
moved on to study traits requiring even a greater degree of subjective
assessment.
Davenport
and other eugenicists were also interested in inherited disorders with
clearly defined phenotypes and, often, straightforward modes of inheritance
that could be deduced from the patterns of inheritance within families.
These included alkaptonuria, hemophilia, ataxia, Huntington's chorea and
albinism – as well as striking skeletal traits such as brachydactyly and
polydactyly. Eugenicists also studied psychiatric disorders that appeared
to be inherited – including feeble-mindedness, manic depression, and dementia
praecox (schizophrenia). A chapter on human genetics in Reginald Punnett's
book, Mendelism (1911), described the Mendelian inheritance of brachydactyly,
hemophilia, and color blindness. However, Punnett acknowledged how difficult
it is to study the inheritance of intelligence and other behavioral characteristics,
which eugenicists believed had the greatest impact on society.
Francis
Galton had aroused interest in the inheritance of behavioral traits in
his book Studies of Hereditary Genius (1869), which purported to show
a high proportion of eminent men in aristocratic British families. The
publication of Davenport's The Trait Book, in 1912, did much to popularize
the search for behavioral traits. Davenport's book was a systematic compilation
of both genetic disorders and supposedly inherited characteristics that
were to be recorded by field workers sent out by the ERO. Davenport was
more egalitarian in this approach than Galton, although many of the special
abilities he included in The Trait Book reflected his own middle class
– such as elocution, drawing, musical composition, and golf. Personality
traits were usually presented in contrasting pairs, with one member of
each clearly carrying moral approval – politeness versus bluntness, self-sacrifice
versus selfishness, and obedience versus disobedience. In most cases,
eugenicists did not actually document any genetic contribution to such
special abilities. However, Davenport did publish a study of naval officers,
who purportedly shared a "sex-limited" (x-linked) gene for thalassophilia,
"love of the sea."
These
studies were of little significance to the practical goal of protecting
the "American" germ plasm. Desirable traits, even if inherited, could
only be spread slowly through directed marriages of "worthy" individuals.
Much more promising was the possibility of preventing the further spread
of undesirable characteristics. For example, shiftlessness was believed
to be one of the inherited traits that contributed to pauperism, the tendency
to be poor. Eugenicists reported that two shiftless parents produced virtually
all shiftless children; the marriage of a shiftless and an industrious
person produced about 10% shiftless offspring. Similarly, eugenicists
assumed that there were inherited tendencies to alcoholism, sexual immorality,
and feeblemindedness that contributed to "criminality."
Eugenicists
identified "good blood" amongst the early settlers of North America, who
came mainly from northern and western Europe. Their genes contributed
to New England's "reputation for conscientiousness and love of learning
and culture." However, eugenicists believed that recent immigrants from
southern and eastern Europe had less desirable traits. So, while Germans
as a rule were "thrifty, intelligent and honest," Italians had a "tendency
to personal violence." Such comparisons led to the inescapable conclusion
that unrestricted immigration would lead to the degeneration of American
germ plasm. By linking undesirable traits with specific racial and ethnic
groups, eugenicists scored a significant impact on social policy with
the passage of restrictive immigration laws in the 1920s.
Davenport
and his contemporaries failed to recognize that not all familial traits
are biologically inherited, and that even traits that are inherited can
have complex causes. This, coupled with an evangelical commitment to create
a society molded in their own image, led the eugenicists to make simplistic
and unsupportable claims about human heredity. Punnett made an early indictment
of the methods during a presentation at the First International Congress
on Eugenics in 1911 – the year The Trait Book was published: "Except
in very few cases, our knowledge of heredity in man is at present far
too slight and too uncertain to base legislation upon…It must be clearly
recognized that the collection of such [accurate] pedigrees is an arduous
undertaking demanding high critical ability…"
The
same inherited disorders studied by the eugenicists continue to occupy
modern clinical geneticists. Causative genes have been isolated for about
40 disorders with straightforward Mendelian inheritance, making possible
DNA-based diagnosis. Most complex behavioral disorders, such as schizophrenia
and manic depression, are hardly better understood today than in Davenport's
time.
|